I found a letter that was a nearly perfect example of the issues I had EVERY single time I had a issue with the Dell servers I use to manage…. use to being the key phrase here. Ill never buy another dell! As of March of 09 this corporate customer of Dell’s had yet to hear back from Dell.

—————–

Dell Inc.

Michael Dell and Michael George

Business Systems Division

One Dell Way

Round Rock, TX 78768

Dear Sirs:

I want to tell you quite clearly why this Dell machine is our last. I have never been treated so poorly and so indifferently by a group of people. Your “customer care” department doesn’t care about anything much less their customers. The courtesy of a written reply is requested.

My company distributes construction supplies and hurricane related supplies – check our website to see how hurricane oriented we are. Before and after a storm we are at our very busiest because the products we sell enable people to protect their homes and businesses from the storms and to repair their homes and business after the storm. Without computers our business is brought almost to a halt, as everything needs to be done manually. Plus orders that are e-mailed don’t arrive at all. We’re based in Florida where we get more than our fair share of hurricanes.

Thursday evening the 25th of August, Hurricane Katrina pounded us rather badly, with the eye wall of the storm passing directly over us. We tried to open Friday the 26th but due to lack of water, electricity, and passable roads we unable to and gave up. Saturday morning we came in and emergency power was in place. Our Dell Dimension 4600 came up and running just fine but within five minutes there was a loud “pop” and it died. The timing could not have been worse. I am not unreasonable I do not fault Dell for an act of Mother Nature.

I immediately called tech support. The man I spoke to (an Indian) was very helpful and after 15 minutes was relatively confident the power supply was the problem. I explained how critical this machine was along with the data on it. I said I didn’t care what it cost, but I needed someone to fix it immediately. He said he couldn’t help with that but that the parts department could. I need to point out I deal with foreign call centers all the time, and unlike most Americans they don’t bother me if they’re well run.

Around 8:50am I was connected to the parts department. The parts department (another Indian) said they could send me the special, proprietary power supply. I said that with no other alternative, that would have to do, but I repeated five times that it must be sent UPS RED EARLY AM delivery: that means by 830am. I specifically asked him if he understood what I needed. I explained how important it was. He took my credit card information and said it would be done. The order number was XXXXX.

I spent all day Saturday calling every single computer store in town that was open, asking if they had a power supply for this unit. They all said “No because Dell uses non-standard parts so you have to deal with them.” Why is such a common part proprietary?

Monday morning, at 9:04am I called parts and asked where my supply was. The nice lady (another Indian) informed me it was in Ohio and that it didn’t ship until Sunday. She suggested that perhaps I call DHL and see what they could do. She didn’t quite seem to get why I was upset and she had this idea it was going to be delivered “later in the day” even though it was still in Ohio. She said I could speak to Technical Support who could help me. After 1 hour and 18 minutes on hold, I got someone who said he couldn’t do anything. I repeated again that it wasn’t the cost, and that I wasn’t asking for anything free, just for someone to come in and fix the computer. He said only Parts could authorize that. After more time on hold, I was finally connected with Parts who said only Tech Support could authorize that.

I asked for the phone number to your corporate office and was refused that information. I called my stockbroker and asked him to look it up. You’re a public company after all. I called your corporate offices and asked to speak to an officer of the company. I was transferred to “Escalation” where I got a “this mailbox is full – please try later” message and got disconnected. I called back immediately and again asked for a human to speak to and was transferred before I even finish my sentence to another voice mailbox which, guess what, was also full.

By noon, I was pretty furious as you can imagine. I called again, and this time got a Customer Care agent in Ireland. She was very friendly but not much more helpful, though she at least pretended to be sympathetic. She transferred me back to Parts and promised to stay on the line, but she didn’t. As always, I was asked for a phone number ‘in case we get disconnected’ but (of course) when I was, nobody called back. It’s nice to have a perfect record but not in this case.

I called your corporate office again and got your “Dell Switchboard” again, which I finally figured out is bogus because you can’t get anybody with authority or anyone who even cares. Finally, I get some lady who tries valiantly to help and stay on the line with me, but said “the hold time is too long” and she’d have to leave me to my own devices. She gives me a third case number (XXXXX, XXXXX, and XXXXX are my three case numbers for the same issue.)

I want to point out that every single person I spoke to was clearly explained to that this was your error and that I didn’t even care about the money, but I just wanted it fixed. Nobody wanted to authorize a technician to come out to our place of business and fix our machine.

I was, sometime around 1pm, after being on the phone with Dell for four hours, transferred to a Tech Support line in Panama. I got a technician named Enrique. You should put him in charge of your company. He listened to me, read the case information, and agreed I had been screwed over. He sat with me on the line for nearly 40 minutes waiting for somebody to come to the line – and they blew him off too. He then took the initiative and scheduled a repair order for an on-site person in an effort to help me (062000311) and I wish to report that I was never called in order to make the appointment. Finally around 3pm, I called the 800 number and they said they’d call me in a day or two to see what they could do. Nobody at your company has any sense of urgency. Do you not understand the severity of this situation?

Tuesday I spent more time on the phone as my system was still down. Your dispatch department couldn’t dispatch anyone because they claimed I didn’t have the part. I told them it was in my hands having finally arrived just before lunchtime, but they argued that their computer reflected otherwise. I asked for a supervisor and spoke to Allison. She took my credit card number and promised someone would be here by 2pm. She never called back and no technician showed up. I left messages for her that were not returned. I called late that evening to cancel the service call as I had made other arrangements. I was told they couldn’t cancel it and I had to call tech support. There is not a chance in hell of me doing that. At least I was nice enough to try to cancel it. If you charge my card I will protest it.

Today is Wednesday and the damned thing is fixed via another vendor who has been promised all future hardware business for helping me with Dell hardware when Dell wouldn’t. Even your competitors can understand a critically important situation. They came to my aid and that speaks volumes about both them and you.

I had sent a draft of this via email before I added the latest travesties and received a call from someone in your Executive Support department. He was very nice and apologetic but I wish to point out that really doesn’t help.

For the record, every single customer who called us and asked why we didn’t answer their emails and why their order wasn’t shipped was told about our Dell saga. I am making this entire letter available to any of our over 15,000 clients who ask, and when we write a letter of apology to all the affected customers they will be told exactly what we think of Dell. Further, a copy is being posted on our website. If Dell cares to write a letter of apology to my customers, I will gladly send it out along with my apology and a copy this letter. (Please make sure you clearly indicate I have permission to do so)

I care that you caused my customers extreme difficulties when they could least afford it. We care about out customers and you clearly don’t. Forget your words, actions speak loudly. We’ve been in business almost fifty years and I can assure you this type of behavior guarantees you won’t be. You should be ashamed. Your activities, while legal, are immoral. You shouldn’t hide from your customers and you do as evidenced by my inability to get anyone in authority on the telephone.

In the meantime, I expect a full refund of shipping charges on the spare part. You probably should do better than that, but I won’t be holding my breath. I can tell you that you have earned the bad press your customer service has been receiving.

Sincerely,

xxxx Name withheld xxxx

I have used Dell servers in the past and because of that that use will always be in the past. Dell does a very good job in their marketing and in getting end users excited about its products. Dell is known for their low prices which they refer to as “value pricing”. Because of that many expect them to always have the “less expensive” unit. This is not true and in many cases IBM will be less expensive on comparably equipped units. However, if Dell knows (or even things) they are competiting against HP or IBM they will switch to protectionist mode and offer a solution that to the untrained eye seems normal but will in fact be a low price, low performance, and low manageability leader. My years in a data center absolutly prevent me from going the Dell route on any purchase. I have had more stress raised and blood pressure boosted because of their lack of quality, preformance, and service.

One customer had so many problems with Dell that he created a site: http://www.ihatedell.net – This site is basically a last resort for support for customers of Dell when their overseas support is unable to resolve tehir problems. The problem with dell is that they are really only good at producing the sheet metal their servers are in. The components, technologies, etc are purchased from manufactures with little to no value add other than the case and shipped to the end user. If you have a problem, Dell is simply a middle man in the way of you getting a resolution.

NY finds Dell Guilty of Fraud

Anyway I don’t want to be on here just doing name calling and the like so in follow-on posts I will go through the Dell and HP product line major product line by major product line.

This week was spent in San Juan, Puerto Rico working with several corporations regarding their virtual desktop deployments. 100_3182.jpg

Through out all the discussions it was interesting to see people reacting to the power requirements for a standard PC vs. that of a thin client coupled with a virtual desktop. I created a keynote presentation where I graphically compared an average PC with a 300 watt flood light bulb. The comparison is only partially accurate though because many PCs, especially older models, draw considerably more power than 300 watts. In fact of the survey of 10 current models from both 2 and 4 letter PC vendors only 1 of the models drew less than 300 watts. The average draw for these 10 models was 335 watts. Additionally all of the models had power supplies that were 80% or less efficient.

IMG_0144.JPG

One of the corporations I spoke with was interested in doing a virtual desktop pilot implementation to consist of virtualizing 100 physical desktops and replacing them with a thin client similar to the models by DevonIT. He wanted to know how much energy he would save because as I have learned energy of any type is expense on the island of Puerto Rico and especially electrical power. This 100+ mile long island you can not simply connect a extension cord to a neighboring state to borrow power. Electrical power comes long distances over expensive pipes.

Anyway I explained to this customer that the answer to his question was somewhat a simple math equation for a simple answer. The equation is:

(PCs to be replaced by thin clients x PC Watts) – ((PCs Replaced with thin clients x 50 watts) + (675 watts x (number of pcs replaced / 50 and rounded up))) = total watts saved

For the customer I was speaking with this savings was over 27k watts.

(100 x 335 watts) – (100 x 50 watts) + (675 watts x (100/50))) =

33,500 watts – (5000 + (675 x 2)) =

33,500 watts – 6350 watts = 27,150 watts worth of savings!

27k watts in ANY corporation is a very large savings but on the island of Puerto Rico the savings are particularly incredible. Savings in this range allows many companies to reach a pay back period of very short durations.

IMG_0131.JPG

In my explanation of this problem, notice that I said that the simple answer to the question was derived from a simple equation? Well, we can go deeper…. The IBM System X 3650 M2 is a new generation Nahalem based server that offers the ability to provide what I term as a balanced systems approach to virtualization along with some major tools and technologies to benefit the entity undertaking virtualization. This IBM System X server is rated to draw 675 watts from 95% power supplies but only if the server is fully maxed out with large memory dimms, disk drives, and all PCI slots. At the same time to actually require 675 watts the system will need to be driving the system to 100% load for CPU, memory, disk, I/O, etc. The chance of this occurring is very minute. What makes this server so compelling to me is some of the IBM mainframe inspired features that are now offered in everyday servers from IBM.

This server comes with IBM’s BMC (baseboard management controller – basically a self contain monitoring server on a chip) and IBM’s Active Eneregy Manager and Virutalizaiton plug ins to extend VMware virtual center to extend the benefit and functionality of VMware’s HA over and above what is available from other 2 and 4 letter IBM competitors. In upcoming posts we will dive deep into IBM’s Enhanced Predictive Failure Analysis, Light-Path Diagnostics, memory resiliency, advanced remote-management capabilities, and embedded RAID controllers. We will see that IBM goes far beyond what others describe as “industry standard” when it comes to enhancing reliability and availability.

Glenn

Choosing a HP Chassis could lead you to being isolated and stranded with a technology infrastructure. HP likes to claim that each time they produce a new blade system it is because they took “a clean slate” approach to developing it. Insiders say it is because they rushed each offering to beat their competitors to market.

HP insiders tell me that the HP in the HP Blade Systems stands for Heat Problems!

This is the history of the HP Chassis and about how often HP stands their customers with “dirty slate” technology and infrastructure

  • HP bh7800 – 2001-2002 (13 U – 3 chassis per rack 16 full height blades)
  • HP e-Class – 2002-2004
  • HP p-Class – 2002-2007
  • HP c-Class – 2007 – ??

Regretfully for their customers – HP has a track record of obsoleting existing blade platforms when it introduces a new one (“a clean slate design”….when will HP announce EOL for the c-Class…tomorrow…next month…a week after you finish your install???

If you do buy HP products I highly recommend you purchase 5 years of maintenance so if they announced end of life EOL tomorrow you will at least get 5 years of support for it.

Choose your IBM Chassis with confidence!

  • IBM BC E – Development started in 1999 – GA 2002 – Support announced thru 2015
    • (OEMed by Intel as Intel Blade Server Chassis SBCE)
  • IBM BC T – 2004 (NEBS compliant – AC/DC Power)
  • IBM BC H – 2006 (High Perf Fabric (10 fabrics))
  • IBM BC HT – 2007 (NEBS compliant – AC/DC Power)
  • IBM BC S – 2007 (Integrated SAN Storage, 120v)

NO OTHER IBM Chassis have been sold.

NO IBM Chassis has ever been retired!

With all the hype and FUD (fear uncertainty and doubt) being spread around by the 2 and 4 letter blade vendors you would think they were God’s gift to blade technology. If you research it you will find it very obvious that neither did they invent it….NOR by any means have they perfected it….as is evedient by their vast portfolio of blade chassis and servers that are no longer offered for sale or supported

———————-

IBM Blade Firsts include (pick out which ones the competition was slamming at the time of release….but now touts as being innovative in their product line):

  1. centralized variable cooling (2002)
  2. centralized shared power (2002)
  3. A 64-bit-enabled Intel blade offering
  4. dual-core AMD Opteron
  5. A blade that can support four 1 Gb Ethernet and four 4 Gb Fibre Channel ports in a single dense blade, with support for 56 blades per 42U rack
  6. 2 socket AMD Opteron 2000 Series processor blade (LS21 in August 2006)
  7. 4 socket AMD Opteron 8000 Series processor blade – (LS41 in early August 2006)
  8. Intel Xeon’s powerful, dual-core, ultra-low-power-consumption (31 watt), 32-bit processors
  9. An enterprise-level, Cisco-based integrated switch in a blade form factor
  10. A modular layer 2/3 networking switch – with both copper and fibre uplinks (Nortel)
  11. Ethernet Layer 2-7
  12. Ethernet 10 Gb Uplink (2006) and full 10 Gb (1/2007)
  13. 4 Gb Fibre Channel support
  14. InfiniBand
  15. support up to eight internal switches
  16. solid state drives (June 2007)
  17. workstation blade with hardware graphic compression (June 2007)
  18. High-speed, affordable SAS-based SAN in a single chassis (2008)
  19. VMotion support in a single chassis (2008)
  20. Standard Intel Blades with Next-generation BIOS—Unified Extensible Firmware Interface (UEFI) (March 2009)
  1. First VMware system vendor
  2. First VMware joint development partner
  3. First to offer comprehensive VMware support
  4. First blade to include VMware
  5. First demonstrated VMware embedded hypervisor
  6. First VMware managed desktop offering
  7. First and ONLY High-speed, affordable SAS-based SAN in a single chassis
  8. First and ONLY VMotion support in a single chassis
  9. Free software (IBM Director) to enable true HA when integrated with VMWare Virtual Center
  • Last year IBM received the US Patent Office’s “Number One Plate Holder” title
  • IBM has received this designation for 16 years straight, winning the 2008 “most innovative” championship with 4,186 U.S. Patents, beating Samsung (3515) and Canon (2114)
  • In 08, as in most years, IBM’s patent issuances are greater than Microsoft, Hewlett-Packard, Dell, Sun, Oracle, Apple, EMC, Accenture and Google combined

IBM BladeCenter is:

  • a simple integration of servers, storage and networking. Its innovative, open design offers a true alternative to sprawling racks and overheated server rooms
  • Built on the IBM X-Architecture® strategy
  • Five different chassis to choose from (with choices: 220v, 120v, AC, DC, Ruggedized, High Performance, Energy Efficient)
  • 14 different blades, 6 different processor types, including solid-state design and a range of expansion modules (Intel, AMD, Power, Cell, Sparc, IXP 2805)
  • An expansive I/O portfolio with simplified deployment and failover capability with virtualization across the entire line of switches thanks to the beauty of our AMM
  • 14 different Fibre Channels and SAS modules from Brocade, QLogic, Cisco, and IBM
  • 14 Different Ethernet and Infiniband modules from Cisco, Nortel, and IBM
  • Software for systems, energy and virtualization management
  • IBM services and support

You can easily judge the character of others by how they treat those who they think can do nothing for them